Review




Structured Review

SUBARU Corporation hsc telescope
Hsc Telescope, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/10__1051_slash_0004___6361_slash_202450453-271-18-13?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hsc telescope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
SUBARU Corporation hsc telescope
Hsc Telescope, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/10__1051_slash_0004___6361_slash_202450453-271-18-13?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hsc telescope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SUBARU Corporation hyper suprimecam (hsc) of the subaru telescope
Hyper Suprimecam (Hsc) Of The Subaru Telescope, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/10__3847_slash_1538___4365_slash_acd3e7-1-22-22?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hyper suprimecam (hsc) of the subaru telescope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SUBARU Corporation telescope subaru/hsc
Telescope Subaru/Hsc, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/10__3847_slash_1538___4357_slash_ac6fd7-283-9-12?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
telescope subaru/hsc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SUBARU Corporation subaru/hsc telescope
Subaru/Hsc Telescope, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/10__1088_slash_1475___7516_slash_2020_slash_09_slash_044-100-7-7?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
subaru/hsc telescope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SUBARU Corporation telescopes subaru/hsc
Telescopes Subaru/Hsc, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/10__1088_slash_1475___7516_slash_2020_slash_09_slash_044-29-4-3?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
telescopes subaru/hsc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SUBARU Corporation telescope subaru hsc
Timeline of major developments in kilonova research
Telescope Subaru Hsc, supplied by SUBARU Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hsc+telescope/pmc06914724-788-22-12?v=SUBARU+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
telescope subaru hsc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Timeline of major developments in kilonova research

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Timeline of major developments in kilonova research

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Luminosity versus time after the merger of a range of heating sources relevant to powering kilonovae. Left: sources of radioactive heating include the decay of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} ∼ 10 - 2 M ⊙ of r-process nuclei, as first modeled in a parametrized way by Li and Paczyński (Eq. , grey band) and then by Metzger et al. using a full reaction network, plotted here using the analytic fit of Korobkin et al. (Eq. , black line) and including the thermalization efficiency of Barnes et al. (Eq. ). The outermost layers of the ejecta may contain \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{-4}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} ∼ 10 - M ⊙ free neutrons (red line), which due to their comparatively long half-life can enhance the kilonova emission during the first few hours if present in the outermost layers of the ejecta due to premature freeze-out of the r -process (Sect. ). Right: heating sources from a central engine. These include fall-back accretion (blue lines), shown separately for NS–NS (solid line) and BH–NS (dashed line) mergers, based on results by Rosswog for an assumed jet efficiency \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _j = 0.1$$\end{document} ϵ j = 0.1 (Eq. ). Also shown is the rotational energy input from the magnetic dipole spin-down of a stable magnetar remnant with an initial spin period of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$P = 0.7$$\end{document} P = 0.7 ms and dipole field strengths of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$B = 10^{15}$$\end{document} B = 10 15 G (brown lines) and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{16}$$\end{document} 10 16 G (orange lines). Dashed lines show the total spin-down luminosity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_{\mathrm{sd}}$$\end{document} L sd (Eq. ), while solid lines show the effective luminosity available to power optical/X-ray emission once accounting for suppression of the efficiency of thermalization due to the high scattering opacity of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$e^{\pm }$$\end{document} e ± pairs in the nebula (Eq. ; Metzger and Piro, ). The isotropic luminosity of the temporally-extended X-ray emission observed following the short GRB 080503 is shown with a green line (for an assumed source redshift \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$z = 0.3$$\end{document} z = 0.3 ; Perley et al. )

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Luminosity versus time after the merger of a range of heating sources relevant to powering kilonovae. Left: sources of radioactive heating include the decay of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} ∼ 10 - 2 M ⊙ of r-process nuclei, as first modeled in a parametrized way by Li and Paczyński (Eq. , grey band) and then by Metzger et al. using a full reaction network, plotted here using the analytic fit of Korobkin et al. (Eq. , black line) and including the thermalization efficiency of Barnes et al. (Eq. ). The outermost layers of the ejecta may contain \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{-4}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} ∼ 10 - M ⊙ free neutrons (red line), which due to their comparatively long half-life can enhance the kilonova emission during the first few hours if present in the outermost layers of the ejecta due to premature freeze-out of the r -process (Sect. ). Right: heating sources from a central engine. These include fall-back accretion (blue lines), shown separately for NS–NS (solid line) and BH–NS (dashed line) mergers, based on results by Rosswog for an assumed jet efficiency \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _j = 0.1$$\end{document} ϵ j = 0.1 (Eq. ). Also shown is the rotational energy input from the magnetic dipole spin-down of a stable magnetar remnant with an initial spin period of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$P = 0.7$$\end{document} P = 0.7 ms and dipole field strengths of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$B = 10^{15}$$\end{document} B = 10 15 G (brown lines) and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{16}$$\end{document} 10 16 G (orange lines). Dashed lines show the total spin-down luminosity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_{\mathrm{sd}}$$\end{document} L sd (Eq. ), while solid lines show the effective luminosity available to power optical/X-ray emission once accounting for suppression of the efficiency of thermalization due to the high scattering opacity of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$e^{\pm }$$\end{document} e ± pairs in the nebula (Eq. ; Metzger and Piro, ). The isotropic luminosity of the temporally-extended X-ray emission observed following the short GRB 080503 is shown with a green line (for an assumed source redshift \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$z = 0.3$$\end{document} z = 0.3 ; Perley et al. )

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Sources of ejecta in NS–NS mergers

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sources of ejecta in NS–NS mergers

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Remnants of NS–NS mergers

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Remnants of NS–NS mergers

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Left: properties of the merger ejecta which affect the EM emission as a function of the binary chirp mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal {M}}_{\mathrm{c}}$$\end{document} M c (Eq. ), taken here as a proxy for the total binary mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{tot}}$$\end{document} M tot . Vertical dashed lines delineate the threshold masses for different merger remnants as marked, for an example EOS with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{TOV}} = 2.1\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M TOV = 2.1 M ⊙ and radius \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R_{1.6} = 12$$\end{document} R 1.6 = 12 km of a \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$1.6\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} 1.6 M ⊙ NS. The top panel shows the ejecta kinetic energy, which we take to be the sum of the initial kinetic energy of the ejecta (estimated using fits to numerical relativity simulations; Coughlin et al. , ) and, in the case of stable or SMNSs, the rotational energy which can be extracted from the remnant before forming a BH (Margalit and Metzger ). The bottom panel shows the ejecta mass, both dynamical and disk wind ejecta, estimated as in Coughlin et al. , where 50% of the disk mass is assumed to be ejected at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v = 0.15$$\end{document} v = 0.15 c (e.g., Siegel and Metzger ). The finite width of the lines results from a range of binary mass ratio \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$q = 0.7$$\end{document} q = 0.7 –1, to which the tidal dynamical ejecta is most sensitive. The ejecta mass line is colored qualitatively according to the dominant color of the kilonova emission, which becomes redder for more massive binaries (with shorter-lived remnants) due to their more neutron-rich ejecta (Metzger and Fernández ). Right: distribution of BNS merger chirp masses drawn from a NS population representative of Galactic double NSs (Kiziltan et al. ). Dashed vertical curves separate the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal {M}}_{\mathrm{c}}$$\end{document} M c parameter space based on the possible merger outcomes in each region. The fraction of mergers expected to occur in each region (the integral over the PDF within this region) is stated above the region in red (see also Table ) Image reproduced with permission from Margalit and Metzger , copyright by the authors

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Left: properties of the merger ejecta which affect the EM emission as a function of the binary chirp mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal {M}}_{\mathrm{c}}$$\end{document} M c (Eq. ), taken here as a proxy for the total binary mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{tot}}$$\end{document} M tot . Vertical dashed lines delineate the threshold masses for different merger remnants as marked, for an example EOS with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{TOV}} = 2.1\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M TOV = 2.1 M ⊙ and radius \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R_{1.6} = 12$$\end{document} R 1.6 = 12 km of a \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$1.6\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} 1.6 M ⊙ NS. The top panel shows the ejecta kinetic energy, which we take to be the sum of the initial kinetic energy of the ejecta (estimated using fits to numerical relativity simulations; Coughlin et al. , ) and, in the case of stable or SMNSs, the rotational energy which can be extracted from the remnant before forming a BH (Margalit and Metzger ). The bottom panel shows the ejecta mass, both dynamical and disk wind ejecta, estimated as in Coughlin et al. , where 50% of the disk mass is assumed to be ejected at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v = 0.15$$\end{document} v = 0.15 c (e.g., Siegel and Metzger ). The finite width of the lines results from a range of binary mass ratio \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$q = 0.7$$\end{document} q = 0.7 –1, to which the tidal dynamical ejecta is most sensitive. The ejecta mass line is colored qualitatively according to the dominant color of the kilonova emission, which becomes redder for more massive binaries (with shorter-lived remnants) due to their more neutron-rich ejecta (Metzger and Fernández ). Right: distribution of BNS merger chirp masses drawn from a NS population representative of Galactic double NSs (Kiziltan et al. ). Dashed vertical curves separate the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal {M}}_{\mathrm{c}}$$\end{document} M c parameter space based on the possible merger outcomes in each region. The fraction of mergers expected to occur in each region (the integral over the PDF within this region) is stated above the region in red (see also Table ) Image reproduced with permission from Margalit and Metzger , copyright by the authors

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Dynamical ejecta masses and velocities from a range of binary neutron star merger simulations encompassing different numerical techniques, various equations of state, binary binary mass ratios \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$q = 0.65{-}1$$\end{document} q = 0.65 - 1 , effects of neutrinos and magnetic fields, together with the corresponding ejecta parameters inferred from the ‘blue’ and ‘red’ kilonova of GW170817. Image reproduced with permission from Siegel

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Dynamical ejecta masses and velocities from a range of binary neutron star merger simulations encompassing different numerical techniques, various equations of state, binary binary mass ratios \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$q = 0.65{-}1$$\end{document} q = 0.65 - 1 , effects of neutrinos and magnetic fields, together with the corresponding ejecta parameters inferred from the ‘blue’ and ‘red’ kilonova of GW170817. Image reproduced with permission from Siegel

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Different components of the ejecta from NS–NS mergers and the possible dependence of their kilonova emission on the observer viewing angle, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\theta _{\mathrm{obs}}$$\end{document} θ obs , relative to the binary axis, in the case of a relatively prompt BH formation (left panel) and a long-lived magnetar remnant (right panel). In both cases, the dynamical ejecta in the equatorial plane is highly neutron-rich ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e \lesssim 0.1$$\end{document} Y e ≲ 0.1 ), producing lanthanides and correspondingly “red” kilonova emission peaking at NIR wavelengths. Mass ejected dynamically in the polar directions may be sufficiently neutron-poor ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e > rsim 0.3$$\end{document} Y e ≳ 0.3 ) to preclude lanthanide production, powering “blue” kilonova emission at optical wavelengths (although this component may be suppressed if BH formation is extremely prompt). The outermost layers of the polar ejecta may contain free neutrons, the decay of which powers a UV transient lasting a few hours following the merger (Sect. ). Re-heating of the ejecta by a delayed relativistic outflow (e.g., the GRB jet or a wind from the magnetar remnant) may also contribute to early blue emission (Sect. ). The innermost ejecta layers originate from accretion disk outflows, which may emerge more isotropically. When BH formation is prompt, the disk wind ejecta is mainly neutron-rich, powering red kilonova emission (Fernández and Metzger ; Just et al. ; Wu et al. ; Siegel and Metzger ). If the NS remnant is instead long-lived relative to the disk lifetime, then neutrino emission can increase \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e$$\end{document} Y e sufficiently to suppress lanthanide production and result in blue disk wind emission (Fig. ; e.g., Metzger and Fernández ; Perego et al. ). Energy input from the central accreting BH or magnetar remnant enhance the kilonova luminosity compared to that exclusively from radioactivity (Sect. )

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Different components of the ejecta from NS–NS mergers and the possible dependence of their kilonova emission on the observer viewing angle, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\theta _{\mathrm{obs}}$$\end{document} θ obs , relative to the binary axis, in the case of a relatively prompt BH formation (left panel) and a long-lived magnetar remnant (right panel). In both cases, the dynamical ejecta in the equatorial plane is highly neutron-rich ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e \lesssim 0.1$$\end{document} Y e ≲ 0.1 ), producing lanthanides and correspondingly “red” kilonova emission peaking at NIR wavelengths. Mass ejected dynamically in the polar directions may be sufficiently neutron-poor ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e > rsim 0.3$$\end{document} Y e ≳ 0.3 ) to preclude lanthanide production, powering “blue” kilonova emission at optical wavelengths (although this component may be suppressed if BH formation is extremely prompt). The outermost layers of the polar ejecta may contain free neutrons, the decay of which powers a UV transient lasting a few hours following the merger (Sect. ). Re-heating of the ejecta by a delayed relativistic outflow (e.g., the GRB jet or a wind from the magnetar remnant) may also contribute to early blue emission (Sect. ). The innermost ejecta layers originate from accretion disk outflows, which may emerge more isotropically. When BH formation is prompt, the disk wind ejecta is mainly neutron-rich, powering red kilonova emission (Fernández and Metzger ; Just et al. ; Wu et al. ; Siegel and Metzger ). If the NS remnant is instead long-lived relative to the disk lifetime, then neutrino emission can increase \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e$$\end{document} Y e sufficiently to suppress lanthanide production and result in blue disk wind emission (Fig. ; e.g., Metzger and Fernández ; Perego et al. ). Energy input from the central accreting BH or magnetar remnant enhance the kilonova luminosity compared to that exclusively from radioactivity (Sect. )

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Radioactivity

Longer-lived remnants produce higher \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e$$\end{document} Y e disk wind ejecta and bluer kilonovae. Shown here is the mass distribution by electron fraction \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e$$\end{document} Y e of the disk wind ejecta, calculated for different assumptions about the lifetime, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_\mathrm{collapse}$$\end{document} t collapse , of the central NS remnant prior to BH formation, from the axisymmetric \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha $$\end{document} α -viscosity hydrodynamical calculations of Metzger and Fernández . A vertical line approximately delineates the ejecta with enough neutrons to synthesize lanthanide elements ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e \lesssim 0.25$$\end{document} Y e ≲ 0.25 ) generate a red kilonova from that with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e > rsim 0.25$$\end{document} Y e ≳ 0.25 which is lanthanide-poor and will generate blue kilonova emission. The NS lifetime has a strong effect on the ejecta composition because it is a strong source of electron neutrinos, which convert neutrons in the disk to protons via the process \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\nu _e + n \rightarrow p + e^{-}$$\end{document} ν e + n → p + e - . This figure is modified from a version in Lippuner et al.

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Longer-lived remnants produce higher \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e$$\end{document} Y e disk wind ejecta and bluer kilonovae. Shown here is the mass distribution by electron fraction \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e$$\end{document} Y e of the disk wind ejecta, calculated for different assumptions about the lifetime, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_\mathrm{collapse}$$\end{document} t collapse , of the central NS remnant prior to BH formation, from the axisymmetric \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha $$\end{document} α -viscosity hydrodynamical calculations of Metzger and Fernández . A vertical line approximately delineates the ejecta with enough neutrons to synthesize lanthanide elements ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e \lesssim 0.25$$\end{document} Y e ≲ 0.25 ) generate a red kilonova from that with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e > rsim 0.25$$\end{document} Y e ≳ 0.25 which is lanthanide-poor and will generate blue kilonova emission. The NS lifetime has a strong effect on the ejecta composition because it is a strong source of electron neutrinos, which convert neutrons in the disk to protons via the process \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\nu _e + n \rightarrow p + e^{-}$$\end{document} ν e + n → p + e - . This figure is modified from a version in Lippuner et al.

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Viscosity, Modification

Schematic illustration of the opacity of the NS merger ejecta as a function of photon energy at a fixed epoch near peak light. The free-free opacity (red line) is calculated assuming singly-ionized ejecta of temperature \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$T = 2\times 10^{4}$$\end{document} T = 2 × 10 4 K and density \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho = 10^{-14}$$\end{document} ρ = 10 - 14 g \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {cm}^{-3}$$\end{document} cm - 3 , corresponding to the mean properties of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{-2} \,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} 10 - 2 M ⊙ of ejecta expanding at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v = 0.1$$\end{document} v = 0.1 c at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t =$$\end{document} t = 3 days. Line opacities of iron-like elements and lanthanide-rich elements are approximated from Figs. 3 and 7 of Kasen et al. . Bound-free opacities are estimated as that of neutral iron (Verner et al. ), which should crudely approximate the behavior of heavier r -process elements. Electron scattering opacity accounts for the Klein–Nishina suppression at energies \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gg m_e c^{2}$$\end{document} ≫ m e c 2 and (very schematically) for the rise in opacity that occurs above the keV energy scale due to all electrons (including those bound in atoms) contributing to the scattering opacity when the photon wavelength is smaller than the atomic scale. At the highest energies, opacity is dominated by pair creation by gamma-rays interacting with the electric fields of nuclei in the ejecta (shown schematically for Xenon, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$A = 131$$\end{document} A = 131 , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Z = 54$$\end{document} Z = 54 ). Not included are possible contributions from r -process dust; or \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma {-}\gamma $$\end{document} γ - γ pair creation opacity at photon energies \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gg m_e c^{2} \sim 10^{6}$$\end{document} ≫ m e c 2 ∼ 10 6 eV (see Eq. )

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of the opacity of the NS merger ejecta as a function of photon energy at a fixed epoch near peak light. The free-free opacity (red line) is calculated assuming singly-ionized ejecta of temperature \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$T = 2\times 10^{4}$$\end{document} T = 2 × 10 4 K and density \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho = 10^{-14}$$\end{document} ρ = 10 - 14 g \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {cm}^{-3}$$\end{document} cm - 3 , corresponding to the mean properties of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{-2} \,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} 10 - 2 M ⊙ of ejecta expanding at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v = 0.1$$\end{document} v = 0.1 c at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t =$$\end{document} t = 3 days. Line opacities of iron-like elements and lanthanide-rich elements are approximated from Figs. 3 and 7 of Kasen et al. . Bound-free opacities are estimated as that of neutral iron (Verner et al. ), which should crudely approximate the behavior of heavier r -process elements. Electron scattering opacity accounts for the Klein–Nishina suppression at energies \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gg m_e c^{2}$$\end{document} ≫ m e c 2 and (very schematically) for the rise in opacity that occurs above the keV energy scale due to all electrons (including those bound in atoms) contributing to the scattering opacity when the photon wavelength is smaller than the atomic scale. At the highest energies, opacity is dominated by pair creation by gamma-rays interacting with the electric fields of nuclei in the ejecta (shown schematically for Xenon, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$A = 131$$\end{document} A = 131 , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Z = 54$$\end{document} Z = 54 ). Not included are possible contributions from r -process dust; or \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma {-}\gamma $$\end{document} γ - γ pair creation opacity at photon energies \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gg m_e c^{2} \sim 10^{6}$$\end{document} ≫ m e c 2 ∼ 10 6 eV (see Eq. )

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Colors and sources of kilonova ejecta in NS–NS mergers

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Colors and sources of kilonova ejecta in NS–NS mergers

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Bolometric luminosity of the kilonova AT2017gfo associated with GW170817 from Smartt et al. with uncertainties derived from the range given in the literature (Smartt et al. ; Waxman et al. ; Cowperthwaite et al. ; Arcavi ). Also shown are lower limits (empty triangles) on the late-time luminosity as inferred from the Ks band with VLT/HAWK-I (Tanvir et al. ) (black) and the 4.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upmu $$\end{document} μ m detections by the Spitzer Space Telescope from Villar et al. ( , green) and (Kasliwal et al. , blue). Colored lines show the ejecta heating rate for models with different values for the ejecta mass and average electron fraction as follows: A ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.15$$\end{document} Y e = 0.15 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.04\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.04 M ⊙ ), B ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.25$$\end{document} Y e = 0.25 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.04\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.04 M ⊙ ), C ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.35$$\end{document} Y e = 0.35 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.055\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.055 M ⊙ ), D ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.45$$\end{document} Y e = 0.45 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.03\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.03 M ⊙ ). While models \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$A-D$$\end{document} A - D assume the FRDM nuclear mass model (Möller et al. ), Model A1 ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.15$$\end{document} Y e = 0.15 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.02\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.02 M ⊙ ) uses the DZ31 nuclear mass model (Duflo and Zuker ). Their corresponding r -process abundance distributions at t = 1 days are shown in the inset. Thermalization is calculated following (Kasen and Barnes ) for an assumed ejecta velocity 0.1 c. The black solid (dashed) horizontal lines in the lower right corner represent the approximate observation limits of the NIR (MIR) instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope for a merger at 100 Mpc. Image reproduced with permission from Wu et al. , copyright by APS

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bolometric luminosity of the kilonova AT2017gfo associated with GW170817 from Smartt et al. with uncertainties derived from the range given in the literature (Smartt et al. ; Waxman et al. ; Cowperthwaite et al. ; Arcavi ). Also shown are lower limits (empty triangles) on the late-time luminosity as inferred from the Ks band with VLT/HAWK-I (Tanvir et al. ) (black) and the 4.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upmu $$\end{document} μ m detections by the Spitzer Space Telescope from Villar et al. ( , green) and (Kasliwal et al. , blue). Colored lines show the ejecta heating rate for models with different values for the ejecta mass and average electron fraction as follows: A ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.15$$\end{document} Y e = 0.15 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.04\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.04 M ⊙ ), B ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.25$$\end{document} Y e = 0.25 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.04\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.04 M ⊙ ), C ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.35$$\end{document} Y e = 0.35 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.055\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.055 M ⊙ ), D ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.45$$\end{document} Y e = 0.45 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.03\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.03 M ⊙ ). While models \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$A-D$$\end{document} A - D assume the FRDM nuclear mass model (Möller et al. ), Model A1 ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$Y_e = 0.15$$\end{document} Y e = 0.15 ; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}} = 0.02\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ej = 0.02 M ⊙ ) uses the DZ31 nuclear mass model (Duflo and Zuker ). Their corresponding r -process abundance distributions at t = 1 days are shown in the inset. Thermalization is calculated following (Kasen and Barnes ) for an assumed ejecta velocity 0.1 c. The black solid (dashed) horizontal lines in the lower right corner represent the approximate observation limits of the NIR (MIR) instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope for a merger at 100 Mpc. Image reproduced with permission from Wu et al. , copyright by APS

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Derivative Assay

r -process nuclei with half-lives  \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}  \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{1/2} = 10{-}100$$\end{document} t 1 / 2 = 10 - 100 days

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: r -process nuclei with half-lives \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{1/2} = 10{-}100$$\end{document} t 1 / 2 = 10 - 100 days

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Kilonova light curves in AB magnitudes for a source at 100 Mpc, calculated using the toy model presented in Sect. , assuming a total ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ , minimum velocity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.1$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.1 c, and gray opacity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 20\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 20 cm 2 g - 1 . The left panel shows a standard “red” kilonova, corresponding to ejecta bearing lanthanide elements, while the right panel shows a “blue” kilonova poor in lanthanides ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 1\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 1 cm 2 g - 1 ). Shown for comparison in the red kilonova case with dashed lines are models from Barnes et al. for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v = 0.1$$\end{document} v = 0.1 c and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ . Depending on the relative speeds of the two components and the viewing angle of the observer, both red and blue emission components can be present in a single merger, originating from distinct portions of the ejecta (Fig. )

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kilonova light curves in AB magnitudes for a source at 100 Mpc, calculated using the toy model presented in Sect. , assuming a total ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ , minimum velocity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.1$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.1 c, and gray opacity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 20\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 20 cm 2 g - 1 . The left panel shows a standard “red” kilonova, corresponding to ejecta bearing lanthanide elements, while the right panel shows a “blue” kilonova poor in lanthanides ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 1\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 1 cm 2 g - 1 ). Shown for comparison in the red kilonova case with dashed lines are models from Barnes et al. for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v = 0.1$$\end{document} v = 0.1 c and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ . Depending on the relative speeds of the two components and the viewing angle of the observer, both red and blue emission components can be present in a single merger, originating from distinct portions of the ejecta (Fig. )

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Comparison

Key properties of GW170817

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Key properties of GW170817

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Potential sources of the fast blue KN ejecta in GW170817 Table reproduced with permission from Metzger et al. ( <xref ref-type= 2018 ), copyright by the authors" width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Potential sources of the fast blue KN ejecta in GW170817 Table reproduced with permission from Metzger et al. ( 2018 ), copyright by the authors

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Bolometric kilonova light curve during the first few hours of a NS–NS merger, calculated for several model assumptions that can reproduce the measured luminosity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_{\mathrm{bol}} \approx 10^{42}$$\end{document} L bol ≈ 10 42 erg \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {s}^{-1}$$\end{document} s - 1 of AT2017gfo at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t \approx 11$$\end{document} t ≈ 11 hr (blue uncertainty bar; e.g., Arcavi et al. ; Cowperthwaite et al. ; Drout et al. ). Black solid lines show how r -process only models change with the assumed timescale \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 = 0.01, 0.1, 1$$\end{document} t 0 = 0.01 , 0.1 , 1 s at which the outer ejecta was last “thermalized”, i.e. endowed with an internal thermal energy comparable to its asymptotic kinetic energy (at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t > rsim t_0$$\end{document} t ≳ t 0 , the ejecta is heated is solely by r -process radioactivity in these models). A small value of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 \sim 0.01$$\end{document} t 0 ∼ 0.01 s corresponds to a dynamical ejecta origin with no additional heating, while a large value of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 \sim 0.01{-}1$$\end{document} t 0 ∼ 0.01 - 1 s represents the case of a long-lived engine (GRB jet, magnetar wind or accretion disk outflow) which re-heats the ejecta on a timescale \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim t_0$$\end{document} ∼ t 0 . We adopt parameters \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta = 3$$\end{document} β = 3 , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.25\,{\hbox {c}}$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.25 c , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 0.025\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 0.025 M ⊙ , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 0.5\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 0.5 cm 2 g - 1 (except for the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 = 1$$\end{document} t 0 = 1 s case, for which \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 0.015\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 0.015 M ⊙ ). Red dashed lines show models with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 = 0.01$$\end{document} t 0 = 0.01 s but for which the outer layer of mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_n$$\end{document} M n is assumed to contains free neutrons instead of r-process nuclei (a model similar to those shown in Fig. ). Note that the early-time signatures of neutron decay are largely degenerate with late-time shock re-heating of the ejecta. Image reproduced with permission from Metzger et al. , copyright by the authors

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bolometric kilonova light curve during the first few hours of a NS–NS merger, calculated for several model assumptions that can reproduce the measured luminosity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_{\mathrm{bol}} \approx 10^{42}$$\end{document} L bol ≈ 10 42 erg \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {s}^{-1}$$\end{document} s - 1 of AT2017gfo at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t \approx 11$$\end{document} t ≈ 11 hr (blue uncertainty bar; e.g., Arcavi et al. ; Cowperthwaite et al. ; Drout et al. ). Black solid lines show how r -process only models change with the assumed timescale \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 = 0.01, 0.1, 1$$\end{document} t 0 = 0.01 , 0.1 , 1 s at which the outer ejecta was last “thermalized”, i.e. endowed with an internal thermal energy comparable to its asymptotic kinetic energy (at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t > rsim t_0$$\end{document} t ≳ t 0 , the ejecta is heated is solely by r -process radioactivity in these models). A small value of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 \sim 0.01$$\end{document} t 0 ∼ 0.01 s corresponds to a dynamical ejecta origin with no additional heating, while a large value of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 \sim 0.01{-}1$$\end{document} t 0 ∼ 0.01 - 1 s represents the case of a long-lived engine (GRB jet, magnetar wind or accretion disk outflow) which re-heats the ejecta on a timescale \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim t_0$$\end{document} ∼ t 0 . We adopt parameters \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta = 3$$\end{document} β = 3 , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.25\,{\hbox {c}}$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.25 c , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 0.025\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 0.025 M ⊙ , \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 0.5\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 0.5 cm 2 g - 1 (except for the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 = 1$$\end{document} t 0 = 1 s case, for which \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 0.015\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 0.015 M ⊙ ). Red dashed lines show models with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_0 = 0.01$$\end{document} t 0 = 0.01 s but for which the outer layer of mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_n$$\end{document} M n is assumed to contains free neutrons instead of r-process nuclei (a model similar to those shown in Fig. ). Note that the early-time signatures of neutron decay are largely degenerate with late-time shock re-heating of the ejecta. Image reproduced with permission from Metzger et al. , copyright by the authors

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Radioactivity

Kilonova light curves, including the presence of free neutrons in the outer \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{n}} = 10^{-4}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M n = 10 - 4 M ⊙ mass layers of the ejecta (“neutron precusor” emission), calculated for the same parameters of total ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ and velocity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.1$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.1 c used in Fig. . The left panel shows a calculation with an opacity appropriate to lanthanide-bearing nuclei, while the right panel shows an opacity appropriate to lanthanide-free ejecta. Models without a free neutron layer ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{n}} = 0$$\end{document} M n = 0 ; Fig. ) are shown for comparison with dashed lines

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kilonova light curves, including the presence of free neutrons in the outer \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{n}} = 10^{-4}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M n = 10 - 4 M ⊙ mass layers of the ejecta (“neutron precusor” emission), calculated for the same parameters of total ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ and velocity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.1$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.1 c used in Fig. . The left panel shows a calculation with an opacity appropriate to lanthanide-bearing nuclei, while the right panel shows an opacity appropriate to lanthanide-free ejecta. Models without a free neutron layer ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{n}} = 0$$\end{document} M n = 0 ; Fig. ) are shown for comparison with dashed lines

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Comparison

The four possible outcomes of a NS–NS merger depend on the total binary mass relative to various threshold masses, each of which is proportional to the maximum mass, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_\mathrm{TOV}$$\end{document} M TOV , of a non-rotating NS (Table ). Prompt BH formation or a short-lived HMNS results generates ejecta with a relatively low kinetic energy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{50}{-}10^{51}$$\end{document} ∼ 10 50 - 10 51 erg (energy stored in the differential rotation of the HMNS remnant can largely be dissipated as heat and thus lost to neutrinos). By contrast, the delayed formation of a BH through spin-down of a SMNS or stable remnant takes place over longer, secular timescales and must be accompanied by the release of substantial rotational energy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{52}{-}10^{53}$$\end{document} ∼ 10 52 - 10 53 erg. Unless effectively “hidden” through GW emission, a large fraction of this energy will be transferred to the ejecta kinetic energy (and, ultimately, the ISM forward shock), thus producing a more luminous kilonova and synchrotron afterglow than for a short-lived remnant Figure credit: Ben Margalit

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: The four possible outcomes of a NS–NS merger depend on the total binary mass relative to various threshold masses, each of which is proportional to the maximum mass, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_\mathrm{TOV}$$\end{document} M TOV , of a non-rotating NS (Table ). Prompt BH formation or a short-lived HMNS results generates ejecta with a relatively low kinetic energy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{50}{-}10^{51}$$\end{document} ∼ 10 50 - 10 51 erg (energy stored in the differential rotation of the HMNS remnant can largely be dissipated as heat and thus lost to neutrinos). By contrast, the delayed formation of a BH through spin-down of a SMNS or stable remnant takes place over longer, secular timescales and must be accompanied by the release of substantial rotational energy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sim 10^{52}{-}10^{53}$$\end{document} ∼ 10 52 - 10 53 erg. Unless effectively “hidden” through GW emission, a large fraction of this energy will be transferred to the ejecta kinetic energy (and, ultimately, the ISM forward shock), thus producing a more luminous kilonova and synchrotron afterglow than for a short-lived remnant Figure credit: Ben Margalit

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Kilonova light curves powered by fall-back accretion, calculated for the same parameters of total ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ and velocity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.1$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.1 c used in Fig. , shown separately assuming opacities appropriate to lanthanide-bearing ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 20\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 20 cm 2 g - 1 ; left panel) and lanthanide-free ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 1\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 1 cm 2 g - 1 ; right panel) ejecta. We adopt ejecta heating rate following Eq. for a constant efficiency \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _{\mathrm{j}} = 0.1$$\end{document} ϵ j = 0.1 and have normalized the fall-back mass to an optimistic value \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\dot{M}}_{\mathrm{fb}}(t = 0.1) = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ˙ fb ( t = 0.1 ) = 10 - 2 M ⊙ \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {s}^{-1}$$\end{document} s - 1

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kilonova light curves powered by fall-back accretion, calculated for the same parameters of total ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 10 - 2 M ⊙ and velocity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$v_0 = 0.1$$\end{document} v 0 = 0.1 c used in Fig. , shown separately assuming opacities appropriate to lanthanide-bearing ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 20\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 20 cm 2 g - 1 ; left panel) and lanthanide-free ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 1\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 1 cm 2 g - 1 ; right panel) ejecta. We adopt ejecta heating rate following Eq. for a constant efficiency \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _{\mathrm{j}} = 0.1$$\end{document} ϵ j = 0.1 and have normalized the fall-back mass to an optimistic value \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\dot{M}}_{\mathrm{fb}}(t = 0.1) = 10^{-2}\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M ˙ fb ( t = 0.1 ) = 10 - 2 M ⊙ \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox {s}^{-1}$$\end{document} s - 1

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Kilonova light curves, boosted by spin-down energy from an indefinitely stable magnetar ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{\mathrm{collapse}} = \infty $$\end{document} t collapse = ∞ ), and taking an opacity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 20\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 20 cm 2 g - 1 appropriate to lanthanide-rich matter. We assume an ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 0.1\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 0.1 M ⊙ (Metzger and Fernández ), initial magnetar spin period \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$P_0 = 0.7$$\end{document} P 0 = 0.7 ms, thermalization efficiency \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _{\mathrm{th}} = 1$$\end{document} ϵ th = 1 and magnetic dipole field strength of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{15}$$\end{document} 10 15 G (left panel) or \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{16}$$\end{document} 10 16 G (right panel). Dashed lines show for comparison the purely r -process powered case

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Kilonova light curves, boosted by spin-down energy from an indefinitely stable magnetar ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{\mathrm{collapse}} = \infty $$\end{document} t collapse = ∞ ), and taking an opacity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 20\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 20 cm 2 g - 1 appropriate to lanthanide-rich matter. We assume an ejecta mass \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M = 0.1\,M_{\odot }$$\end{document} M = 0.1 M ⊙ (Metzger and Fernández ), initial magnetar spin period \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$P_0 = 0.7$$\end{document} P 0 = 0.7 ms, thermalization efficiency \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _{\mathrm{th}} = 1$$\end{document} ϵ th = 1 and magnetic dipole field strength of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{15}$$\end{document} 10 15 G (left panel) or \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^{16}$$\end{document} 10 16 G (right panel). Dashed lines show for comparison the purely r -process powered case

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Comparison

Same as Fig. , but calculated for an ejecta opacity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 1\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 1 cm 2 g - 1 relevant to lanthanide-free matter

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Same as Fig. , but calculated for an ejecta opacity \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa = 1\hbox { cm}^{2}\hbox { g}^{-1}$$\end{document} κ = 1 cm 2 g - 1 relevant to lanthanide-free matter

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Range of kilonova properties

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Range of kilonova properties

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques:

Schematic illustration mapping different types of mergers and their outcomes to trends in their kilonova light curves. The top panel shows the progenitor system, either an NS–NS or an NS–BH binary, while the middle plane shows the final merger remnant (from left to right: an HMNS that collapses to a BH after time \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{\mathrm{collapse}}$$\end{document} t collapse , a spinning magnetized NS, a non-spinning BH and a rapidly spinning BH). The bottom panel illustrates the relative amount of UV/blue emission from an neutron precursor (purple), optical emission from lanthanide-free material (blue) and IR emission from lanthanide containing ejecta (red). Note: the case of a NS–NS merger leading to a slowly spinning black hole is unlikely, given that at a minimum the remnant will acquire the angular momentum of the original binary orbit. Modified from a figure originally presented in Kasen et al. , copyright by the authors

Journal: Living Reviews in Relativity

Article Title: Kilonovae

doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration mapping different types of mergers and their outcomes to trends in their kilonova light curves. The top panel shows the progenitor system, either an NS–NS or an NS–BH binary, while the middle plane shows the final merger remnant (from left to right: an HMNS that collapses to a BH after time \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{\mathrm{collapse}}$$\end{document} t collapse , a spinning magnetized NS, a non-spinning BH and a rapidly spinning BH). The bottom panel illustrates the relative amount of UV/blue emission from an neutron precursor (purple), optical emission from lanthanide-free material (blue) and IR emission from lanthanide containing ejecta (red). Note: the case of a NS–NS merger leading to a slowly spinning black hole is unlikely, given that at a minimum the remnant will acquire the angular momentum of the original binary orbit. Modified from a figure originally presented in Kasen et al. , copyright by the authors

Article Snippet: Given such relatively dim emission, only the largest aperture telescopes (e.g., DECam, Subaru HSC, or LSST) are capable of detecting the low- \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{\mathrm{ej}}$$\end{document} M ej red kilonova of a prompt collapse (Fig. , right panel).

Techniques: Modification